The IRS publicly released a private letter ruling* in which it concluded that an agreement between a county teaching hospital and a nonprofit state school, under which the hospital’s facilities will be made available for the students’ clinical rotations, will not result in private business use of the hospital.
Specifically, the IRS determined that although the agreement did not meet the applicable safe harbor, the agreement would not result in private business use of the hospital based on all of the facts and circumstances. Read PLR 201726007 [PDF 57 KB] (dated April 4, 2017, and released June 30, 2017).
*Private letter rulings are taxpayer-specific rulings furnished by the IRS Office of Chief Counsel in response to requests made by taxpayers and can only be relied upon by the taxpayer to whom issued. Pursuant to section 6110(k)(3), written determinations such as private letter rulings are not intended to be relied upon by third parties and may not be cited as precedent. These written determinations may, however, offer an indication of the IRS’s position on the issues addressed.
Tax-exempt status generally is denied for “private activity” bonds. A private activity bond is part of any bond issue that meets the private business use test and the private security or payment test. A bond falls afoul of the private business use test if more than 10% of the issue’s proceeds are to be used for any private business use. Private business use is defined as direct or indirect use in a trade or business carried on by any person other than a governmental unit.
The provision of services under a management contract does not by itself result in private business use if requirements as to compensation arrangements and other matters are satisfied. Rev. Proc. 2017-13 provides safe harbor conditions under which a management contract does not result in private business use of property financed with governmental tax-exempt bonds or cause the modified private business use test for property financed with qualified 501(c)(3) bonds to be met. If a management contract meets the requirements of the revenue procedure, the contract does not result in private business use. Read additional information about Rev. Proc. 2017-13 in TaxNewsFlash-Exempt Organizations.
In PLR 201726007, the IRS concluded that despite the fact that neither the school nor the hospital would pay the other any form of compensation, the agreement constituted a management contract as defined in Treasury regulations. Accordingly, the IRS analyzed the agreement under Rev. Proc. 2017-13 to determine whether the arrangement qualified for the safe harbor provided therein.
Without noting which of the safe harbor conditions the agreement failed to meet, the IRS concluded that the agreement did not qualify for the Rev. Proc. 2017-13 safe harbor. Nevertheless, the IRS ruled that the agreement would not result in private business use based on all of the facts and circumstances.
Notwithstanding the inapplicability of the safe harbor, the IRS stated that the requirements of Rev. Proc. 2017-13 “are useful reference points for this analysis.” Specifically, the following factors from the revenue procedure tended to show that the agreement would not result in private business use:
For more information, contact a tax professional with KPMG’s Washington National Tax practice:
Alexandra Mitchell | +1 202 533 6078 | email@example.com
Randall Thomas | +1 202 533 3786 | firstname.lastname@example.org
© 2018 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.