Representatives from over 70 jurisdictions today participated in an OECD ceremony for the signing of a multilateral convention to implement tax treaty-related measures to prevent base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS).
The multilateral instrument (MLI) was signed by 67 countries and jurisdictions, covering some 68 jurisdictions. Eight jurisdictions expressed their intention to become signatories of the MLI. Read the list of signatory countries and jurisdictions [PDF 127 KB].
The MLI enables all signatories to meet their treaty-related minimum standards under the BEPS project—the minimum standard for the prevention of treaty abuse under Action 6 and the minimum standard for the improvement of dispute resolution under Action 14—and also measures to address hybrid mismatch arrangements under Action 2 and the strengthened definition of permanent establishment under Action 7.
The MLI provides flexibility in various ways to accommodate the positions of various countries. For example, countries may choose which existing tax treaties they would like to be modified by the MLI. In addition, flexibility is provided with respect to ways of meeting the BEPS minimum standards on treaty abuse and dispute resolution, and countries may opt out of or provide alternative provisions which do not reflect a BEPS minimum standard. Once a tax treaty has been listed by the two treaty partner countries, the treaty becomes an agreement to be covered by the MLI. Read text of the MLI [PDF 276 KB].
The OECD reports that the 67 signatories have listed over 2,300 treaties that, in turn, have already resulted in over 1,100 matching agreements. The OECD expects the number of modified tax treaties to continually increase as additional jurisdictions sign the MLI.
In addition, the OECD noted that the following 25 of the signatories to the MLI on 7 June 2017 signed up for the arbitration provisions in the MLI:
Andorra, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Fiji, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Portugal, Singapore, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
This will lead to the introduction of arbitration to over 150 existing treaties. Most of the countries opting in for arbitration have opted for the default option of final offer arbitration (also referred to as “baseball arbitration”).
The OECD continues to develop tools and guidance on the MLI and recently has provided the following documents on its website:
The OECD expects to launch a public online matching tool. The first part of the tool will be made available as soon as possible, after all the data from the various countries’ MLI positions has been carefully processed and analyzed. The tool will then be expanded and refined over the next couple of years, for example to include detailed information on the timing of the modifications made by the MLI.
The signing of the MLI is seen as a catalyst for action by taxpayers who need to quickly assess how particular treaties will change, evaluate how and when their operations might be affected, and develop plans to address that impact.
For more information, contact a KPMG tax professional:
Manal Corwin | +1 (202) 533-3127 | firstname.lastname@example.org
Michael Plowgian | +1 (202) 533-5006 | email@example.com
Jesse Eggert | +1 (202) 533-5512 | firstname.lastname@example.org
© 2017 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.