The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today reversed a federal district court, and held that the IRS was not immune from suit in an action brought by tax preparation and refund-advance businesses in connection with an IRS “sting operation” with respect to fraudulent tax refunds.
The case is: Synder & Associates Acquisitions, LLC v. United States, 15-56011 (9th Cir. June 16, 2017). Read the Ninth Circuit’s decision [PDF 174 KB] that includes a concurring opinion.
The IRS set out to catch individuals filing for fraudulent tax refunds. The IRS enlisted the assistance of the plaintiffs’ tax preparation and refund-advance businesses, and warned that refusal to cooperate would interfere with a federal criminal investigation. The IRS used millions of the plaintiffs’ dollars as bait, and promised to reimburse them for any losses. The plaintiffs cooperated, but the IRS never returned their money. Instead, at the conclusion of the sting operation, the IRS subpoenaed more than 5,000 of plaintiffs’ documents to assist with its prosecution efforts and revoked one plaintiff’s electronic tax filing privileges—at the beginning of the tax preparation season—forcing both plaintiffs into bankruptcy.
The plaintiffs sued the IRS under the Federal Tort Claims Act, alleging several causes of action, but the federal district court granted the government’s motion to dismiss. The district court held that the IRS was immune from liability for its conduct because 28 U.S.C. § 2680(c) bars claims against the government “arising in respect of the assessment or collection of any tax.”
Today, the Ninth Circuit reversed, finding that 28 U.S.C. § 2680(c) did not confer absolute immunity on the IRS. The Ninth Circuit construed the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, and found the IRS’s sting operation did not “aris[e] in respect of the assessment or collection of any tax.”
© 2018 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.