The U.S. Court of Federal Claims today denied the taxpayer's motion for summary judgment and granted summary judgment for the government in a refund proceeding concerning the taxpayer's request to apply the interest netting rules of section 6621(d).
The Court of Federal Claims held that the taxpayer was not entitled to net its overpayment interest with underpayment interest of a foreign sales corporation (FSC) that was owned by the taxpayer because the taxpayer and the FSC were not the same taxpayer (as required under section 6621(d)).
The case is: Ford Motor Co. v. United States, No. 14-458T (Fed. Cl. May 30, 2017). Read the Court of Federal Claims’ decision [PDF 162 KB]
The taxpayer applied to balance the interest it owed and paid on underpayments of taxes with interest received from the IRS on tax overpayments. The taxpayer made an overpayment to the IRS for the taxes it owed in 1992, while a former foreign sales corporation (FSC) owned by the taxpayer had tax underpayments between 1990 and 1998. While the interest netting rules allow a taxpayer, under certain circumstances, to “net” accrued interest on equivalent underpayments and overpayments, the IRS denied the taxpayer's attempts to net its overpayment against the FSC's underpayments because the taxpayer and the FSC were not the same taxpayer as required by section 6621(d). The Court of Federal Claims today agreed with the government that the taxpayer and its former FSC were not the same taxpayer, and granted summary judgment for the government.
© 2017 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.