The U.S. Tax Court today issued an opinion concerning a defined benefit plan and the taxpayer’s failure to report and pay excise taxes under section 4972 for nondeductible contributions to the plan. The Tax Court found that the taxpayer neglected to apply the correct method to reduce the maximum benefits under section 415(b)(2)(C) for a retirement age before age 62 under its plan, when the plan did not provide for forfeiture of the participant’s benefits at death. Because of this error, portions of the taxpayer’s contributions to the plan during tax years 2002 through 2006 were nondeductible, resulting in liability for section 4972 excise taxes.
The case is: Pizza Pro Equipment Leasing, Inc. v. Commissioner, 147 T.C. No. 14 (November 17, 2016). Read text of the Tax Court’s opinion [PDF 194 KB]
A defined benefit pension plan, as adopted effective January 1, 1995, was a qualified plan under section 401(a) throughout the years at issue. At all relevant times, the plan had a single participant (the company’s president). The plan’s normal retirement age was set at age 45 years. The plan provided that the participant’s accrued benefits vested fully at death and were payable as a death benefit to the participant’s designated beneficiary.
The plan filed Forms 5500, Annual Return/Report of Employee Benefit Plan, for each of the plan years 2002 through 2006, which coincided with the calendar year and the plan’s and the company’s tax years. However, no Forms 5330, Return of Excise Taxes Related to Employee Benefit Plans, were ever filed. The IRS filed substitute Form 5330 returns on behalf of the taxpayer / company for the years at issue and subsequently determined deficiencies and additions to tax related to nonpayment of the section 4972 excise taxes. The IRS asserted that portions of the taxpayer’s contributions to the plan were nondeductible because the plan’s funding did not fully account for the proper reductions imposed by section 415(b)(2)(C) for benefits beginning before age 62.
The issues addressed by the Tax Court, and the court’s findings) are summarized by the court as follows:
© 2017 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.