The U.S. Tax Court today issued an opinion concluding that an electric power corporation that had sought to manage its taxable gain of $1.6 billion from the sale of fossil fuel power plants in 1999—through a series of like-kind exchanges using sale-leaseback strategies entered into between the taxpayer and unrelated third parties (tax-exempt public utilities)—did not satisfy the like-kind exchange requirements of section 1031 and that the agreements it entered into and involving the public utilities were not true leases, but were loans because the transactions did not transfer the benefits and burdens of ownership to the taxpayer.
The case is Exelon Corp. v. Commissioner, 147 T.C. No. 9 (September 19, 2016). Read the 176-page opinion [PDF 547 KB] of which 93 pages present the factual background in this case.
The Tax Court’s briefly summarized the facts in this case as follows:
The IRS issued deficiency notices for 1999 and for 2001. For 1999, the IRS determined a deficiency in tax exceeding of $431 million and a penalty under section 6662(a) exceeding $86 million. The Tax Court upheld the deficiency determination and penalty assessment for 1999.
Concerning the 2001 tax year, the Tax Court upheld that deficiency determination and concluded that the taxpayer:
This discussion simply sets forth the ultimate findings in this case, and is based on a preliminary reading of the court’s opinion as issued late this afternoon.
© 2016 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.