The U.S. Tax Court today issued a memorandum opinion concerning a newspaper’s motion to intervene in a case concerning deficiencies determined with respect to a U.S.-based multinational entity’s cost-sharing arrangement entered into with a Luxembourg affiliate.
The Tax Court announced that it would hold the newspaper’s motion to intervene in abeyance until the parties have exercised their rights under a protective order, with a view to determining which portions of the trial record will have the seal removed and which portions containing confidential information must be sealed permanently. Amazon.com, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2016-131 (July 18, 2016).
Read today’s Tax Court memo opinion [PDF 76 KB]
Under a cost-sharing arrangement, the U.S. taxpayer transferred pre-existing intangible assets to a Luxembourg entity, with the parties agreeing to share future intangible development costs. The IRS determined deficiencies for tax years 2005 and 2006 arising from the cost-sharing arrangement, and the taxpayer eventually sought review of the deficiency determinations by the Tax Court.
In March 2016, a U.S. affiliate of a major British newspaper (a non-party) filed a motion to intervene in the Tax Court proceedings, for the purpose of urging the Tax Court to unseal or to make available in unredacted form, certain trial records that have been sealed under a protective order. The newspaper asserted that it had “recently published an investigation focusing on [the taxpayer’s] decision to move … business operations to Luxembourg” and that the documents in question “reach matters of intense public interest.”
In the main proceedings between the taxpayer and the IRS, the Tax Court had issued a pre-trial protective order to protect certain trade secrets, proprietary technology, non-public financial information, and other sensitive technical data. The Tax Court had concluded that disclosure of this confidential information would damage the company and its shareholders by revealing trade secrets or other confidential information. Trial exhibits that were not designated by the taxpayer as containing confidential information have been currently available for public inspection.
When the newspaper’s motion to intervene was filed, the newspaper requested access to items, of which only eight were designated as containing confidential information.
As the Tax Court explained in today’s memorandum opinion, the newspaper is free to request copies of trial exhibits that are not those designated as containing confidential information. Further, the Tax Court announced that it would hold the newspaper’s motion to intervene in abeyance until the parties have exercised their rights under the protective order, with a view to determining which portions of the trial record will have the seal removed and which portions containing confidential information must be sealed permanently.
© 2016 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.