A Republican member of the House Ways and Means Committee this week released a plan for a comprehensive tax reform option with a credit-invoice value added tax (VAT).
Rep. Jim Renacci (R-OH), a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, on July 14, 2016, released a white paper [PDF 1.47 MB]—Simplifying America’s Tax System (“SATS plan”)—outlining a comprehensive tax reform proposal.
With respect to businesses, the SATS plan would:
With respect to individuals, the SATS plan proposes:
Rep. Renacci has indicated that he views his white paper as the “beginning of the conversation” and that he seeks feedback from taxpayers. While general comments are welcome, he is particularly interested in comments on particular questions set forth in the white paper concerning:
Last month, House Republicans released a "blueprint" for tax reform that proposes to reduce tax rates for businesses and individuals and to move the U.S. tax system closer to a consumption-based tax system through reforms of the income tax rules (without providing a VAT or national sales tax). The blueprint was developed by Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady with input from the broader House Republican caucus. Read TaxNewsFlash-Legislative Update
Rep. Renacci’s proposed SATS plan reflects an even more overt move to a consumption-based system with respect to business activity—it would completely eliminate the current corporate income tax and replace it with a credit-invoice VAT system.
The move towards a consumption-based system reflected in both the blueprint and the SATS plan underscores that House Republican tax-writers are looking at tax reform in a fundamentally different manner than as in the past. If Republicans continue to control the House next year, these approaches can be expected to be the new starting point for tax reform discussions, rather than the Tax Reform Act of 2014 proposed in a previous Congress by then-chair of the Ways and Means Committee, Dave Camp.
Moreover, it is worth noting that the SATS plan includes some features that may have bipartisan appeal. For example, the SATS plan would dedicate revenue from a one-time repatriation tax to the highway trust fund; it is described as similar to a VAT proposed by a Democratic senator (Sen. Cardin); it would expand the EITC and the standard deduction; and it would eliminate “distortions” resulting from the current rate differential between ordinary income and capital gain.
Still, as the white paper indicates, there are many details that remain to be resolved. For example, because VAT regimes shift the tax from income to consumption, they are often considered to be less progressive in allocating the tax burden. Thus, it remains to be seen how much political and stakeholder support may emerge for the proposal. Nonetheless, it could be a starting point for discussion and negotiation.
© 2018 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.