The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) today released a discussion draft that concerns approaches to address base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) involving interest in the banking and insurance sectors under Action 4 (Interest deductions and other financial payments) of the BEPS project.
Read the discussion draft [PDF 791 KB]
The BEPS Action 4 report (released in October 2015) sets out an approach to address base erosion and profit shifting of interest and payments that are economically equivalent to interest. This includes a “fixed ratio rule” to limit an entity’s net interest deductions to a set percentage of its tax-EBITDA, and a “group ratio rule” to allow an entity to claim higher net interest deductions, based on a relevant financial ratio of its worldwide group.
The BEPS Action 4 report also identifies factors that suggest that a different approach may be needed to address risks posed by entities in the banking and insurance sectors, including:
The BEPS Action 4 report, therefore, allows countries to exclude entities in banking and insurance groups, and regulated banks and insurance companies in non-financial groups, from the scope of the fixed ratio rule and group ratio rule. It provides that further work would be conducted in 2016 to identify approaches suitable for addressing the BEPS risks posed by these sectors, taking into account their particular characteristics.
According to today’s OECD release, the discussion draft does not change any of the conclusions in the BEPS Action 4 report, but provides a more detailed consideration of the BEPS risks posed by banks and insurance companies and those posed by entities in a group with a bank or insurance company, such as holding companies, group service companies, and companies engaged in non-regulated financial or non-financial activities.
For banks and insurance companies, a limited BEPS risk has been identified, and the discussion draft explores why this might be the case, the protection provided by regulatory capital rules, and the limits to this protection that differ between countries. Given the differences in risk faced by countries, the discussion draft does not propose a single approach, but provides that countries need to introduce rules to deal with their actual BEPS risks.
For other entities in a banking or insurance group, the discussion draft identifies a greater BEPS risk and recommends that countries consider applying the fixed ratio rule and group ratio rule to these entities, but with modifications in certain situations. In each situation, countries are allowed flexibility to take into account particular features of their tax law and policy.
Today’s OECD release notes that the options included in the discussion draft do not represent the consensus view of the Committee on Fiscal Affairs (CFA) or its subsidiary bodies, but are intended to provide stakeholders with substantive options for analysis and comment. The BEPS Action 4 report calls for this work to be completed in 2016. Interested parties are invited to send comments on the discussion draft, including responses to the specific questions identified in the discussion draft. Comments are due by 8 September 2016.
© 2016 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.