CRS: moving goal posts, upward costs? | KPMG | QA

CRS: moving goal posts, upward costs?

CRS: moving goal posts, upward costs?

The Bill introducing the Common Reporting Standard (CRS), introduced into the House of Representatives on 3 December 2015, is likely to be passed by Parliament soon. These rules will apply from 1 July 2017 (not 1 January 2017, as originally envisaged by the earlier Exposure Draft). Jenny Clarke and Martin Koeleman provide insight into the changes to the Bill not in the original Exposure Draft.


Related content

Goal keeper reaching for soccer ball

All Financial Institutions (including Depository Institutions, Custodial
Institutions, Investment Entities and Specified Insurers) need to prepare for
and understand these rules.

In addition to the push out of the expected implementation date, there have been some changes to the Bill before Parliament that were not in the original Exposure Draft:

  • Financial Institutions that fail to collect account holder self-certifications about the jurisdiction of residence for tax purposes (and account holders that provide false or misleading self-certifications) may be subject to administrative penalties (as set out in the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA 1953)).
  • As an anti-avoidance measure, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) may require an account to be treated as a Reportable Account in certain circumstances. Similarly, the ATO will also have the ability to treat an entire Financial Institution as a Reporting Financial Institution if it reasonably believes that the Financial Institution undertook a transaction or entered into an arrangement with the dominant purpose of avoiding its reporting liability.
  • Statements in respect of Lower Value Accounts or Pre-existing Entity Accounts may only be required to be provided to the ATO by 31 July 2019.
  • Reporting Financial Institutions need to maintain records for five years (from the date of providing a statement to the ATO) that records the due diligence procedures undertaken to discharge its obligations in terms of the CRS.

Affected institutions should ensure that, at the very least, preparations are underway in order to be ready well before the go-live date of 1 July 2017.

Interestingly, the Explanatory Memorandum to the CRS Bill notes that the costs for Australian financial institutions to comply with CRS has been estimated at over $67 million per year. Clearly, the Government must be of the view that the increased tax collections as a result of signing up to the CRS, at least in the long run, will far outweigh the costs of compliance.

The emotional toll on the tax/compliance teams of our local Financial Institutions, however, cannot be quantified.

© 2018 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

Connect with us


Request for proposal