You will find below a summary of some of the most important tax developments that have happened since the release of our last newsletter, at OECD, EU or country level, in the area of tax transparency and the fight against tax avoidance.
ECOFIN Meeting on Corporate Tax and release of a draft EU Anti-BEPS Directive
On 8 December 2015, the Council of the EU (ECOFIN) met to discuss recent corporate taxation initiatives launched by the European Commission and supported by the European Parliament. The ECOFIN discussed inter alia the status of the proposals for a Directive on a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) taking into account the Commission’s work on a potential anti-BEPS Directive. The ECOFIN also formally adopted the Directive amending the existing Directive on administrative co-operation in the field of direct taxation (2011/16/EU) on automatic exchange of information on tax rulings, as well as agreements with Liechtenstein, San Marino (approved for signing), and Switzerland on the automatic exchange of financial account information.
Further to this meeting, the Council released details of a possible draft EU directive addressing certain BEPS issues. The issues covered reflect certain international aspects of the proposal for a CCCTB, including a number that are directly linked to BEPS Actions. The proposed rules lay down standard de minimis rules in relation to the definition of permanent establishment, Controlled Foreign Companies, a switch-over clause, general anti-abuse rules (GAAR), exit taxation, interest limitation, and hybrid mismatches.
For more details, read newsletters dated 9 and 17 December prepared by KPMG EU Tax Center
EU Parliament issues recommendations to combat aggressive corporate tax planning and evasion
The resolution, passed on 16 December 2015, builds on the work of the Parliament’s Special Committee on Tax Rulings, whose recommendations were approved at the 26 November plenary session. Members at the Parliament asked the Commission, inter alia, to table a proposal for country-by-country reporting on profit, tax and subsidies by June 2016, as well as a proposal for introducing a "Fair Tax Payer" label, introduce a Common Tax Base (CCTB) as a first step, which later on should be consolidated as well (CCCTB), strengthen the mandate and improve transparency of the Council Code of Conduct Working Group on Business Taxation, provide guidelines regarding “patent boxes” so as to ensure they are not harmful, etc. The EU Commission will have three months to respond to every legal recommendation, even if it does not submit a legislative proposal.
EU Parliament has also agreed on a new six-month mandate for the Special Committee on Tax Rulings, which includes close monitoring of the legal initiatives related to corporate taxation. The new committee will also follow up on on-going work by international institutions, including the OECD and G20.
The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes on 30 October 2015 released new compliance ratings on transparency in tax matters following a peer review process. Luxembourg received the overall rating of "largely compliant" with the Global Forum commending Luxembourg’s firm commitment towards the efficient implementation of internationally agreed transparency standards for tax purposes.
Please follow this link to view the press release of the Luxembourg government.
BEPS Action 5 - Luxembourg: Repeal of the current Intellectual Property (IP) regime
The Luxembourg Parliament voted on 17 December 2015 the Budget Bill for 2016, which includes the repeal of the current IP regime. This measure aims at ensuring that Luxembourg is compliant with BEPS Action 5 recommendations. The Bill does not contain any provisions on a new IP regime (which would be in line with the Nexus approach). However, one may expect the release of new legislation in the coming months.
Please follow this link to view our newsletter.
BEPS Action 13 - Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting
Several countries, listed below, either plan to pass, or have already passed, laws implementing Country-by-Country (CbC) reporting (and other transfer pricing disclosure requirements based on Action 13 of the BEPS Action Plan) by the financial year-end.
The Australian Parliament on 3 December 2015 passed the multinational anti-avoidance rule (i.e. Australia's 'de facto' diverted profits tax regime) and the CbC reporting regime. The new rule also foresees the amendment of tax laws governing the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) public disclosures of tax return data to now include Australian owned private companies with annual income of A$200 million or more, as well as the requirement for Australian businesses of multinational corporations with global income of A$1 billion or more to prepare general purpose financial reports for years commencing on or after 1 July 2016.
In addition, the ATO on 17 December 2015 released guidelines that address CbC reporting. Read more
The Danish Parliament on 18 December 2015 passed the legislation to require CbC reporting. Accordingly, multinational groups whose ultimate parent company is a resident in Denmark will be required to make CbC reporting submissions. The CbC reporting rules will also affect foreign group entities that are residents in Denmark if certain conditions are met. Read more
On 18 December, 2015, the French Parliament adopted the Finance Bill for 2016, which includes a “CbC reporting” for the largest multinational enterprises. This CbC reporting requirement generally reflects the BEPS recommendations. Contrary to the initial proposal, the disclosure will not be made public. Read more
The President on 22 December 2015 signed into law Finance Act 2015 that includes rules following the OECD's recommended CbC reporting requirements. The Finance Act provision closely mirrors the OECD’s suggested model legislation. Read more
The 2016 budget law voted on 22 December 2015 includes CbC annual reporting requirements for multinational entities pursuant to the BEPS recommendations. Read more
The Ruling Coalition on 16 December 2015 agreed on the Outline of the 2016 Tax Reform proposals, which includes rules on CbC reporting based on BEPS 13 recommendations.
Korea’s Parliament on 2 December 2015 approved legislation to implement BEPS 13 recommendations. The rules require all Korean domestic corporations and all foreign corporations with a domestic place of business in Korea that are engaged in certain cross-border related-party transactions to file both master file and local file reports. Read more
New law in Poland expands the requirements for transfer pricing documentation and includes CbC reporting. The new provisions essentially reflect the recommendations made in BEPS Action 13, and provide for CbC, master file and local file reporting. The legislation was passed by the Lower House in September 2015 and the President signed the amendments to the law on 27 October 2015. Read more (PDF, 298 KB)
The Treasury Department and IRS on 21 December 2015 released for publication in the Federal Register proposed regulations that would require annual CbC by U.S. persons that are the ultimate parent entity of a multinational enterprise (MNE) group. Read more
United States - Congressional hearings on BEPS
On 1 December 2015, the Senate Finance Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee’s Subcommittee on Tax Policy both held hearings relating to the BEPS project.
In advance of these hearings, the Joint Committee on Taxation released a report (PDF, 340 KB) describing the background, summary, and implications of the BEPS project.
Finance bill 2016 - draft clauses
The UK Government published on 9 December 2015 draft clauses for its forthcoming Finance Bill 2016, for consultation.
These include new anti-hybrid rules, which effectively prevent a tax deduction in the UK for a cross border payment where that payment is not subject to the relevant foreign tax. The rules also cover situations where there is a double deduction for the same payment.
Changes to the Patent Box regime would restrict its availability and link its benefits to research and development incurred by the relevant company.
In addition, there would be a requirement for large businesses to publish on the internet their tax strategy as it relates to UK taxation.
Consultation process opened
Following the October 2015 release of the BEPS deliverables, some consultations in the UK have already been opened—including one on the UK’s rules concerning the deductibility of corporate interest expense and how this treatment would be affected by BEPS Action 4 (which seeks to develop recommendations in the design of rules limiting the deductibility of interest and other financial payments made to third parties and related parties).
New tax treaty between Australia and Germany
The new tax treaty signed between Australia and Germany on 12 November 2015 is the first tax treaty Australia has signed that comprehensively incorporates the proposals in the BEPS final recommendations. This includes several provisions in line with BEPS Action 6 recommendations.
EU Commission asks the Netherlands to amend the Limitation on Benefits clause (LOB) in the Dutch-Japanese Tax Treaty.
The Commission believes that under the current terms of the LOB clause, some entities located elsewhere in the EU/EEA are excluded from the benefits of the tax treaty. This means that they suffer higher withholding taxes on dividends, interest and royalties received from Japan than similar companies with Dutch shareholders or whose shares are listed and traded on "recognised stock exchanges", which include only certain EU and third-country stock exchanges.
For further information, please do not hesitate to contact us.
The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.