On 23 January 2017, the Hong Kong Government briefed the Legislative Council Panel on Economic Development about a proposed new tax regime for aircraft leasing in Hong Kong. This is a very welcome development for which the Hong Kong Government should be commended.
Aircraft financing presents a major opportunity that complements Hong Kong’s traditional strengths in the fields of financial and professional services. It’s expected that over 6,000 commercial aircraft will be delivered globally over the next 20 years, with a high proportion being delivered to Asia. Hong Kong, with its established business infrastructure, should be a natural venue for aircraft operating lessors. However, the current tax law in Hong Kong is a major impediment, because it taxes the full rental income while denying deductions for aircraft depreciation and certain interest costs. Ironically, Hong Kong has the most competitive withholding tax rate for aircraft leases into China, but other jurisdictions such as Ireland and Singapore are currently much more attractive options overall.
To make Hong Kong more competitive for operating leases, a new set of tax rules for offshore aircraft leasing (i.e., leasing to non-Hong Kong airlines) isbeing proposed. The main features of the new regime are:
The new regime will contain anti-abuse features including:
The Hong Kong Government proposes to introduce the necessary legislation into the Legislative Council in April 2017.
The briefing paper can be found here: http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr16-17/english/panels/edev/papers/edev20170123cb4-410-8-e.pdf
Overall, this is a welcome development. The current tax regime has needlessly impeded the development of the aircraft leasing business in Hong Kong. The proposal to effectively allow tax depreciation through a deemed profit of 20% of the net rental income is a simple solution to what has been a big problem. In addition, the tax rate concession is very attractive to leasing managers. At face value, these proposals should make the Hong Kong tax regime competitive globally, especially if foreign tax credits are allowed for withholding taxes paid outside Hong Kong by lessees.
As always, the “devil is in the detail”, particularly around the issue whether the overall economics will make sense compared to operations in Ireland, Singapore and the special free trade zone regimes in Mainland China. Recent experience with enhancements to concessionary regimes such as the expanded offshore funds regime and Corporate Treasury Centres, while good proposals on paper, have proved to be less useful in practice due to the overly complex anti-abuse measures. We would hope that these new leasing proposals will not suffer the same fate.
It will be interesting to see how these new rules will tie with the existing aircraft owning provisions in Sections 23C and 23D of the Hong Kong Inland Revenue Ordinance. There is also an important issue relating to the distinction in the current law between operating leases and hire purchase agreements (i.e., finance leases), especially in light of the impending changes to the accounting rules for lessees in IFRS 16.
All in all, these proposals are a step in the right direction. Along with a continued focus on expanding Hong Kong’s double tax treaty network, this proposal has the potential to finally make Hong Kong truly competitive in the global aircraft leasing market.