The Supreme Court of India held that “inland container depots” are “inland ports,” and that the taxpayer was eligible for a benefit under section 80-IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on profits earned from inland container depots.
The case is: CIT v. Container Corporation of India Ltd.
The taxpayer (a “government company”) was engaged in handling and transporting cargo in containers under the direct administrative control of the Ministry of Railways, with operating activities mainly carried out at inland container depots, container freight stations, and port-side container terminals.
The taxpayer—during assessment years 2003-2004 to 2005-2006—claimed various deductions, including under section 80-IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The deduction, as claimed on the profits earned from the inland container depots and relating to rolling stocks, was rejected by the Assessing Officer, and also denied by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The deductions were allowed by a tribunal with regard to rolling stocks, but not as to the inland container depots. A high court held that the taxpayer was entitled to claim a deduction on the income earned from the inland container depots. The tax department appealed to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court held that inland container depots are inland ports and are thus eligible for the tax benefits under section 80-IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the profits earned from the inland container depots.
Read a May 2018 report [PDF 731 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in India
© 2018 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.