PSD2 is going to create an open field for innovation and improvements in existing systems but the adaptation rates can vary as regulators will be cautious in providing third party licenses.
The banks, mostly traditionally ran are investing heavily to modernize themselves and compete or collaborate with the influx of FinTech’s all around the globe. In this blog post we will explore the potential business models or strategies the banks are looking at and the potential advantages that banks will have if they adopt these strategies.
In this PSD2 environment, the banks can decide their way forward depending upon their willingness and capability to adapt to this scenario. This could be in the following possible ways:
Apart from the above two aspects, the banks can opt to go completely online and collaborate with FinTechs providing various services to the users. It’s not a conventional approach, however, it can leverage the increasing online financial services market and availability of multiple customer channels. This type of collaboration can create opportunities for both banks and FinTech’s as they can leverage each other’s strengths to make the most of the online banking scenario and be market leaders.
In the recent past we have seen several financial services initiatives coming up in the market, symbolizing the need for banks to innovate in this environment. Some of the examples include BBVA and Credit Agricole1.
After looking at the potential models, we can focus on the main factors that will shape the landscape for banks and customers after the PSD2 implementation. These are highlighted in the diagram and the text below.
As a part of PSD2 implementation, considerable amounts of user data will be made available, which can be advantageous since:
As per a survey conducted by KPMG, 61% of respondents believe that next generations will switch banks as easily as they switch their energy or telecom provider3.
The pricing strategies by the banks can have two types of effects:
This means that banks would need to maintain competitive prices for their offerings so as to retain customers.
To adapt to any of the business models the banks will have to invest heavily in resources both for technology upgrades and compliance purposes. The banks might not be able to recover all these costs in a conventional manner and will have to provide value added services for additional revenues.
Banks as Third Party
Direct Access - Focusing on their direct access to the retail client base, the banks can themselves via an interface act as a third party payment service provider. Not all banks will gain from this but it could be advantageous for many others.
To summarize, we can see that introduction of PSD2 will create advantages for customers and both challenges and opportunities for the banks. But in order to benefit from PSD2, banks will have to invest heavily and test potential strategies to differentiate themselves from their peers. In the next post of this series we will highlight XS2A, share some examples from the market and also highlight the steps taken by FinTech’s to make the most of PSD2.
Martijn Berghuijs, Senior Manager, KPMG The Netherlands
Shashank Batra, Senior Consultant, KPMG The Netherlands
1 Data Sharing and Open Data for Banks Report: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/382273/141202_API_Report_FINAL.PDF
3 Next Generation Banking Survey, KPMG. October, 2015
© 2017 KPMG N.V., registered with the trade register in the Netherlands under number 34153857, is a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative ('KPMG International'), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. KPMG International Cooperative ('KPMG International') is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.