>> Go back to Euro Tax Flash homepage
On June 17, 2016 the Economic and Financial Affairs Council (ECOFIN) of the EU held discussions with a view to reaching a political agreement on the proposal for an anti-tax avoidance directive (ATAD), which had been a high priority for the Dutch Presidency. In the light of these discussions the Presidency put forward a final compromise text, to which almost all delegations could agree and announced a ‘silence’ procedure until Monday, 20 June 2016. As no objections were raised by that deadline, political agreement was reached and the text will be submitted to a later ECOFIN meeting for formal adoption. The Presidency compromise text on the ATAD as well as the Council statements, which form the basis for the political agreement, are available here. The ECOFIN also approved Conclusions on the work of the Code of Conduct Group during the Netherlands Presidency, and particularly welcomed the agreement reached on new guidance on hybrid permanent establishment mismatches involving third countries. Finally, a short discussion was held as regards the status of the proposal for a Directive on a Financial Transaction Tax (FTT).
The anti-tax avoidance directive is one of the two legislative pillars of the European Commission’s Anti-Tax Avoidance Package (ATAP), presented in January 2016. The directive is intended to provide a minimum level of protection for the internal market and strengthen the average level of protection against aggressive tax planning.
Adoption of the ATAD has been one of the main goals of the Dutch Presidency, which ends in June 2016. Despite the Presidency’s ambitions, an attempt to reach political agreement at the ECOFIN meeting of May 25, 2016 proved unsuccessful (see ETF 285). The updated Presidency Compromise on the ATAD reflects work subsequently carried out including a meeting with the high-level working party on taxation on June 3 and a meeting of Fiscal Attachés on June 13.
The proposed rules lay down common minimum rules in the areas of interest limitation, exit taxation, general anti-abuse rules (GAAR), controlled foreign companies (CFC) and hybrid mismatches.
In addition to the ATAD, the agreement covers a Council statement requesting the Commission to put forward a (legislative) proposal on hybrid mismatches involving third countries by October 2016. The statement is an integral part of the political agreement and intended to satisfy those Member States which were of the opinion that third-country mismatches should have been included in the ATAD.
Finally some Member States’ concerns as regards ensuring a level playing field at international level were addressed in a Council statement forming part of the agreement under which the Commission will closely monitor and engage with the OECD with regard to implementing the BEPS recommendations. The European Commission will also be required to provide an impact assessment 4 years after the directive comes into force, and especially of the interest deduction limitation rules.
The main changes from the previous published version of the ATAD (available here) relate to the CFC rules. The previous wording which referred to an effective corporate tax rate of at least 50 percent of that of the parent’s Member State has been replaced with a test based on the difference between actual corporate tax paid and the tax that would have been paid in the parent’s Member State. However, the intention is that this would achieve effectively the same result as the original wording. In addition, the substance requirement, which applies in principle to EU and non-EU situations, with the option for Member States to limit such requirement to EU situations only, has been amended, to reflect current case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union in this respect.
With respect to the interest stripping rules, a 5 year transition period (until 2024) was introduced for Member States wishing to keep their domestic targeted rules such as thin capitalization rules as a substitute for the interest stripping rules.
Finally, the controversial switch-over clause has been deleted.
The ECOFIN also approved Conclusions on the work of the Code of Conduct Group during the Netherlands Presidency, which is summarized in the Group’s report issued on June 13, 2016. The Finance Ministers particularly welcomed the agreement reached on a new guidance on hybrid permanent establishment mismatches involving third countries.
The guidance foresees that where (1) non-taxation without inclusion or (2) double deduction arise as a result of a mismatch situation in relation to a hybrid permanent establishment, the Member State concerned should align the treatment of the business activities concerned as being carried out (or not) through a PE to the treatment applied by the third state. If this is not sufficient and a double deduction still occurs, that Member State should in addition deny deductions to the company carrying on the business activities that give rise to the mismatch. Finally, the guidance - whose scope is limited to situations involving a Member State and a third country - clarifies that it is should only be applicable to the extent necessary for the purpose of preventing a double deduction or non-taxation without inclusion and not for any other purpose. It remains to be seen whether these guidelines will be reflected in the above-mentioned legislative proposal.
Based on a report submitted to the ECOFIN the ECOFIN briefly discussed the way forward for this proposal. Austria underlined that there is a strong convergence on the core design of the tax, but that further work is needed on (1) the taxation of derivatives and its potential impact on borrowing costs, and (2) the appropriate mechanisms for an effective collection of the tax. These issues will be addressed by two dedicated task force groups, to be set-up.
Following this political agreement, the ATAD should be formally adopted without further discussion during the next ECOFIN meeting on July 12, 2016. Member States will then have until 31 December 2018 to implement the main provisions of the directive in their national legislation, which would then apply as from 1 January 2019.
In accordance with the agreement reached with the Czech Republic delegation, the European Commission also committed to present, before the end of 2016, a legislative proposal allowing Member States to apply a generalised VAT reverse charge mechanism to certain domestic supplies.
This is the second legislative proposal in the Commission’s Anti-Tax Avoidance Package to reach political agreement, after the formal adoption of the proposal for automatic exchange of country-by-country reports at the last ECOFIN meeting in May 2016. Although the final text still needs to be formally adopted, this rapid consensus constitutes another indication of the EU’s strong political will to effectively tackle tax avoidance.
© 2018 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.