Principles on bank disclosures updated to reflect accounting for expected credit losses
In this latest development in the drive to improve investor confidence in financial reports by banks, the Enhanced Disclosure Taskforce (EDTF) has revisited and updated the principles outlined in its 2012 report.
With the advent of accounting standards featuring expected credit loss models in both IFRS – i.e. IFRS 9 Financial Instruments – and US GAAP, this revision specifically considers the additional disclosure needs that arise when applying expected credit loss techniques given the greater degree of management judgment required and inherently complex model based calculations.
“Improved risk disclosure is a must-have for banks seeking to build trust and transparency; properly reflecting the risks that have been taken is key.”
The EDTF aims to help users of financial statements to better understand the risks taken by banks, through supporting banks in ensuring that such risks are reflected in their financial statements and risk disclosures. The EDTF also aims to achieve greater consistency and comparability of disclosures across internationally active banks.
The new report analyses the applicability of the original report’s seven principles and 32 recommendations. All of the principles were reconfirmed with an emphasis on Principles 1, 3 and 6 as follows.
The report addresses:
All of the suggested disclosures are linked to one of the original 32 recommendations of the 2012 report.
|Temporary considerations||Permanent disclosures|
|These are focused on information that can be provided in anticipation of the first-time adoption date||These are focused on policy and model considerations that will be informative to investors in the annual report|
|For example: Disclosures on timelines, comparisons to current provisioning methodologies and potential impacts –such as on key ratios, capital and stress testing.||
For example: Disclosures regarding key concepts and definitions, how risk management structures are affected, key policy interpretations and model information.
In addition, there is a recommendation that banks consider how credit quality disclosures can be made that are similar to regulatory disclosures.
The EDTF recommends an approach that weighs the timing of quantitative and qualitative information against the reliability of that information such that the nature and extent of disclosures will develop gradually in the run up to a 2018 implementation date.
An indicative timeline for a typical bank with a December year end has been provided, consistent with the timing of annual reports − i.e. 2015 annual report issued early 2016.
Visit our IFRS for Banks hot topics page for the latest on IFRS developments that directly impact banks, and the potential accounting implications of regulatory requirements.
And visit our IFRS – Financial instruments hot topics page to find out more about the requirements of the new financial instruments standard, IFRS 9.
This web article is also available in print-friendly format.
<p>© 2018 KPMG IFRG Limited is a UK company, limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. KPMG IFRG Limited, registered in England No 5253019. Registered office: 15 Canada Square, London, E14 5GL, UK.</p> <p>KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.<br> </p>