Commissioner of Taxation v Hacon | KPMG | AU
close
Share with your friends

Commissioner of Taxation v Hacon case

Commissioner of Taxation v Hacon

Jenny Wong and Matthew McRae explore the legislative background to the recent Commissioner of Taxation v Hacon case.

1000

Director, Australian Tax Centre

KPMG Australia

Contact

Also on KPMG.com

Gavel and open book

The Commissioner of Taxation is required to request further information from an applicant where he or she considers it would be needed to make a private ruling, but also has the discretion to decline to make a ruling that would depend on assumptions about a future event or other matter.

So how do we distinguish a case where the Commissioner can legitimately decline to make a private ruling, from one where he or she has to ask for more information from the taxpayer?

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) recently released a Decision Impact Statement which summarised the Full Federal Court Case: Commissioner of Taxation v Hacon Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 181, which dealt with precisely this issue.  

Hacon: the facts

In Hacon, the taxpayer (a large grazing outfit) sought a private ruling from the Commissioner about the potential application of Part IVA to a proposed restructure.

The Commissioner ultimately declined to make a ruling on the basis that they would need to make assumptions in order to do so, and compiled a non-exhaustive list of the matters that these assumptions related to in a document provided to the taxpayer.

To read more analysis of this case, please register for KPMG Tax Now

Connect with us

 

Request for proposal

 

Submit